
Date: 11/23/2024 11/24/2024
Location: Star Ocean Meditation Center
Teacher: Sara
Dharma Knowledge
How Karma Is Formed
Karma is often misunderstood as a mystical system of reward and punishment, as if some transcendent force records actions and distributes outcomes. This interpretation does not reflect the Dharma. Karma is not an external judgment mechanism, but the operation of causality at the level of mind and behavior. To understand how karma is formed, one must examine intention, action, and cognition rather than moral accounting.
In the Dharma, the word “karma” (kamma) means intentional action. The decisive factor is not the external form of an act, but the intention behind it. Physical actions, speech, and even thoughts constitute karma when they are accompanied by volition. Reflexes, involuntary reactions, or purely accidental events do not generate karma.
The first mechanism of karmic formation is motivation. Greed, aversion, and ignorance are the primary karmic roots. When an action is driven by craving, resistance, or misperception, it not only produces immediate effects but also leaves a tendency within the mental continuum. This tendency is not a metaphysical imprint, but a strengthening of cognitive and behavioral patterns. A single action has limited impact; repetition creates momentum.
The second mechanism is habituation. Each time the mind responds to a situation in a particular way, the likelihood of responding in that same way increases. Karma, therefore, is not fate but a self-reinforcing loop of action, reaction, and repetition. To “create karma” is not to manufacture future events, but to solidify a habitual mode of engaging with reality.
The third mechanism is identification. As patterns become entrenched, individuals begin to identify with them: “I am an angry person,” “I am someone who cannot let go.” This identification further stabilizes karma, making behavior appear inevitable rather than chosen. At this stage, karma is no longer experienced as action, but mistaken for personality or essence.
Karma does not operate in isolation from conditions. The results of actions depend on the interaction between internal motivation and external circumstances. The same action can lead to different outcomes in different contexts. For this reason, the Dharma does not propose a simple one-to-one correspondence between cause and effect, but emphasizes conditional complexity. Karma is not a linear equation, but a dynamic network of conditions.
Crucially, karma is not confined to the past. Since karma is formed through intentional action, it can be altered by intentional action. When behavior is no longer driven by greed, aversion, and ignorance, but guided by clarity and understanding, old tendencies weaken. The transformation of karma does not occur through the passage of time, but through the correction of perception.
The core of Dharma practice lies in intervening at the moment karma is formed. Ethical discipline restrains harmful actions; mental stability makes impulses visible before they become actions; wisdom exposes the distorted assumptions underlying intention. When action ceases to be automatic, the conditions for producing further karma dissolve.
Thus, karma is neither destiny nor moral judgment. It is a neutral causal description of how actions arise from particular ways of seeing, and how those actions shape the mind in return. To understand karma is not to fear the future, but to stop generating unnecessary suffering in the present.