Date: 12/30/2023 12/31/2023
Location: Star Ocean Meditation Center
Teacher: Laura
Dharma Knowledge
The similarities between the Dharma and science
The similarities between the Dharma and science have become an increasingly important topic in the modern world. At first glance, the Dharma appears rooted in ancient contemplative traditions, while science is based on modern experimentation and technology. Yet a closer examination reveals that they share significant common ground in how they seek to understand reality and human experience.
Both the Dharma and science place strong emphasis on direct experience. Science relies on observation, experimentation, and verification, while the Dharma encourages individuals to examine their own experience and test teachings through practice. The Buddha did not demand belief based on faith alone, but invited people to see for themselves whether the teachings led to clarity and reduced suffering. This experiential approach closely parallels the scientific method.
Another important similarity lies in their attitude toward authority. Scientific progress depends on questioning established theories and revising conclusions in light of new evidence. Likewise, the Dharma cautions against accepting teachings merely because of tradition, scripture, or authority figures. Reasoned inquiry and personal verification are central to both approaches.
In their understanding of the structure of reality, the Dharma and science also converge. The Dharma teaches dependent origination, the idea that all phenomena arise through interconnected conditions rather than existing independently. Modern science, particularly in fields such as physics and systems theory, similarly reveals a universe composed of interrelated processes rather than isolated entities. This shared emphasis on interdependence forms a key point of resonance.
Regarding the concept of self, both the Dharma and science challenge the notion of a fixed, unchanging identity. The Dharma views the self as a dynamic process composed of physical and mental factors. Contemporary neuroscience and psychology increasingly support this view, showing that consciousness and personality emerge from complex and changing processes rather than a permanent core.
Methodologically, the practices of the Dharma and the investigations of science both involve systematic inquiry. Meditative practices are structured, progressive, and repeatable, with practitioners often reporting similar experiences under similar conditions. Although the Dharma focuses on inner experience, its disciplined approach resembles scientific investigation in its logic and rigor.
Both the Dharma and science also acknowledge the limits of knowledge. Scientific theories are provisional and subject to revision, while the Dharma recognizes that concepts and language are only tools for pointing toward reality, not reality itself. This shared humility fosters openness and ongoing exploration rather than dogmatism.
In the modern world, dialogue between the Dharma and science has become increasingly valuable. Science excels at understanding and transforming the external world, while the Dharma offers tools for understanding and stabilizing the inner world. When these two approaches complement each other, they support not only technological advancement but also psychological well-being and ethical reflection.
In conclusion, although the Dharma and science differ in focus and expression, they share deep similarities in their reliance on experience, critical inquiry, and recognition of impermanence and interdependence. Rather than being opposed, they can be seen as complementary ways of exploring reality and deepening human understanding.
